However this doesn’t sound like such a situation due to the fact that she most likely aren’t a person with a disability. Therapy dogs she should have known aren’t covered under the ADA. So why in the first place mention that. People for some reason got the laws wrong. They have this thing that service dogs / animals have legal rights. But the animals don’t it’s the person with disabilities that have the legal right to be accompanied by a Individually trained service dog that performs specific tasks to benefit said individual. It’s not the other way around. Not all service dog teams carry ID’s this is not required.

Fortunately or unfortunately if she did make a scene stores may not want to pursue it. However if they did then she would indeed have to show documentational proof. 1. She is a qualified person with a disability. 2. The animal in question is indeed a Individually Trained service dog. And actually 3. That said dog wasn’t unruly or inappropriate behaviour. I doubt she could even show proof to one thing.

Thanks for Blogging the Change.
Kim (and Amy by proxy)